|
|
|
| |
CHRIST-MASS 2002
|
09/23/2003 |
Just a little about this pagan holiday from history (Alexander Hyslop)
The festivals of Rome are innumerable; but five of the most important may
be singled out for elucidation--viz., Christmas-day, Lady-day, Easter, the
Nativity of St. John, and the Feast of the Assumption. Each and all of these
can be proved to be Babylonian. And first, as to the festival in honour of
the birth of Christ, or Christmas. How comes it that that festival was
connected with the 25th of December? There is not a word in the Scriptures
about the precise day of His birth, or the time of the year when He was
born. What is recorded there, implies that at what time soever His birth
took place, it could not have been on the 25th of December. At the time that
the angel announced His birth to the shepherds of Bethlehem, they were
feeding their flocks by night in the open fields. Now, no doubt, the climate
of Palestine is not so severe as the climate of this country; but even
there, though the heat of the day be considerable, the cold of the night,
from December to February, is very piercing, * and it was not the custom for
the shepherds of Judea to watch their flocks in the open fields later than
about the end of October. * It is in the last degree incredible, then,
that the birth of Christ could have taken place at the end of December.
There is great unanimity among commentators on this point. Besides Barnes,
Doddridge, Lightfoot, Joseph Scaliger, and Jennings, in his "Jewish
Antiquities," who are all of opinion that December 25th could not be the
right time of our Lord's nativity, the celebrated Joseph Mede pronounces a
very decisive opinion to the same effect. After a long and careful
disquisition on the subject, among other arguments he adduces the
following;--"At the birth of Christ every woman and child was to go to be
taxed at the city whereto they belonged, whither some had long journeys; but
the middle of winter was not fitting for such a business, especially for
women with child, and children to travel in. Therefore, Christ could not be
born in the depth of winter. Again, at the time of Christ's birth, the
shepherds lay abroad watching with their flocks in the night time; but this
was not likely to be in the middle of winter. And if any shall think the
winter wind was not so extreme in these parts, let him remember the words of
Christ in the gospel, 'Pray that your flight be not in the winter.' If the
winter was so bad a time to flee in, it seems no fit time for shepherds to
lie in the fields in, and women and children to travel in." * Indeed, it is
admitted by the most learned and candid writers of all parties * that the
day of our Lord's birth cannot be determined, * and that
within the Christian Church no such festival as Christmas was ever heard of
till the third century, and that not till the fourth century was far
advanced did it gain much observance. How, then, did the Romish Church fix
on December the 25th as Christmas-day? Why, thus: Long before the fourth
century, and long before the Christian era itself, a festival was celebrated
among the heathen, at that precise time of the year, in honour of the birth
of the son of the Babylonian queen of heaven; and it may fairly be presumed
that, in order to conciliate the heathen, and to swell the number of the
nominal adherents of Christianity, the same festival was adopted by the
Roman Church, giving it only the name of Christ. This tendency on the part
of Christians to meet Paganism half-way was very early developed; and we
find Tertullian, even in his day, about the year 230, bitterly lamenting the
inconsistency of the disciples of Christ in this respect, and contrasting it
with the strict fidelity of the Pagans to their own superstition. "By us,"
says he, "who are strangers to Sabbaths, * and new moons, and festivals,
once acceptable to God, the Saturnalia, the feasts of January, the Brumalia,
and Matronalia, are now frequented; gifts are carried to and fro, new year's
day presents are made with din, and sports and banquets are celebrated with
uproar; oh, how much more faithful are the heathen to their religion, who
take special care to adopt no solemnity from the Christians." * Upright men
strive to stem the tide, but in spite of all their efforts, the apostacy
went on, till the Church, with the exception of a small remnant, was
submerged under Pagan superstition. That Christmas was originally a Pagan
festival, is beyond all doubt. The time of the year, and the ceremonies with
which it is still celebrated, prove its origin. In Egypt, the son of Isis,
the Egyptian title for the queen of heaven, was born at this very time,
"about the time of the winter solstice." * The very name by which Christmas
is popularly known among ourselves--Yule-day * --proves at once its Pagan
and Babylonian origin. "Yule" is the Chaldee name for an "infant" or "little
child;" * and as the 25th of December
was called by our Pagan Anglo-Saxon ancestors, "Yule-day," or the "Child's
day," and the night that preceded it, "Mother-night," * long before they
came in contact with Christianity, that sufficiently proves its real
character. Far and wide, in the realms of Paganism, was this birth-day
observed. This festival has been commonly believed to have had only an
astronomical character, referring simply to the completion of the sun's
yearly course, and the commencement of a new cycle. * But there is
indubitably evidence that the festival in question had a much higher
reference than this--that it commemorated not merely the figurative
birth-day of the sun in the renewal of its course, but the birth-day of the
grand Deliverer. Among the Sabeans of Arabia, who regarded the moon, and not
the sun, as the visible symbol of the favourite object of their idolatry,
the same period was observed as the birth festival. Thus we read in
Stanley's Sabean Philosophy: "On the 24th of the tenth month," that is
December, according to our reckoning, "the Arabians celebrated the BIRTHDAY
OF THE LORD--that is the Moon. * The Lord Moon was the great object of
Arabian worship, and that Lord Moon, according to them, was born on the 24th
of December, which clearly shows that the birth which they celebrated had no
necessary connection with the course of the sun. It is worthy of special
note, too, that if Christmas-day among the ancient Saxons of this island,
was observed to celebrate the birth of any Lord of the host of heaven, the
case must have been precisely the same here as it was in Arabia. The Saxons,
as is well known, regarded the Sun as a female divinity, and the Moon as a
male. * It must have been the birth-day of the Lord Moon, therefore, and not
of the Sun, that was celebrated by them on the 25th of December, even as the
birth-day of the same Lord Moon was observed by the Arabians on the 24th of
December. The name of the Lord Moon in the East seems to have been Meni, for
this appears the most natural interpretation of the Divine statement in
Isaiah lxv. 11, "But ye are they that forsake my holy mountain, that prepare
a temple for Gad, and that furnish the drink-offering unto Meni." * There is
reason to believe that Gad refers to the sun-god, and that Meni in like
manner designates the moon-divinity. * Meni, or Manai, signifies "The
Numberer." and it is by
the changes of the moon that the months are numbered: Psalm civ. 19, "He
appointed the moon for seasons: the sun knoweth the time of its going down."
The name of the "Man of the Moon," or the god who presided over that
luminary among the Saxons, was Mane, as given in the "Edda," * and Mani, in
the "Voluspa." * That it was the birth of the "Lord Moon" that was
celebrated among our ancestors at Christmas, we have remarkable evidence in
the name that is still given in the lowlands of Scotland to the feast on the
last day of the year, which seems to be a remnant of the old birth festival
for the cakes then made are called Nur-Cakes, or Birth-cakes. That name is
Hogmanay. * Now, "Hog-Manai" in Chaldee signifies "The feast of the Numberer;"
in other words, The festival of Deus Lunus, or of the Man of the Moon. To
show the connection between country and country, and the inveterate
endurance of old customs, it is
worthy of remark, that Jerome, commenting on the very words of Isaiah
already quoted, about spreading "a table for Gad," and "pouring out a
drink-offering to Meni," observes that it "was the custom so late as his
time [in the fourth century], in all cities especially in Egypt and at
Alexandria, to set tables, and furnish them with various luxurious articles
of food, and with goblets containing a mixture of new wine, on the last day
of the month and the year, and that the people drew omens from them in
respect of the fruitfulness of the year." * The Egyptian year began at a
different time from ours; but this is a near as possible (only substituting
whisky for wine), the way in which Hogmanay is still observed on the last
day of the last month of our year in Scotland. I do not know that any omens
are drawn from anything that takes place at that time, but everybody in the
south of Scotland is personally cognisant of the fact, that, on Hogmanay, or
the evening before New Year's day, among those who observe old customs, a
table is spread, and that while buns and other dainties are provided by
those who can afford them, oat cakes and cheese are brought forth among
those who never see oat cakes but on this occasion, and that strong drink
forms an essential article of the provision.
Even where the sun was the favourite object of worship, as in Babylon itself
and elsewhere, at this festival he was worshipped not merely as the orb of
day, but as God incarnate. * It was an essential principle of the Babylonian
system, that the Sun or Baal was the one only God. * When, therefore, Tammuz
was worshipped as God incarnate, that implied also that he was an
incarnation of the Sun. In the Hindoo Mythology, which is admitted to be
essentially Babylonian, this comes out very distinctly. There, Surya, or the
sun, is represented as being incarnate, and born for the purpose of subduing
the enemies of the gods, who, without such a birth, could not have been
subdued. *
It was no mere astronomic festival, then, that the Pagans celebrated at the
winter solstice. That festival at Rome was called the feast of Saturn, and
the mode in which it was celebrated there, showed whence it had been
derived. The feast, as regulated by Caligula, lasted five days; * loose
reins were given to drunkenness
and revelry, slaves had a temporary emancipation, * and used all manner of
freedoms with their masters. * This was precisely the way in which,
according to Berosus, the drunken festival of the month Thebeth, answering
to our December, in other words. the festival of Bacchus, was celebrated in
Babylon. "It was the custom," says he, "during the five days it lasted, for
masters to be in subjection to their servants, and one of them ruled the
house, clothed in a purple garment like a king." * This "purple-robed"
servant was called "Zoganes," * the "Man of sport and wantonness," and
answered exactly to the "Lord of Misrule," that in the dark ages, was chosen
in all Popish countries to head the revels of Christmas. The wassailling
bowl of Christmas had its precise counterpart in the "Drunken festival" of
Babylon; and many of the other observances still kept up among ourselves at
Christmas came from the very same quarter. The candles, in some parts of
England, lighted on Christmas-eve, and used so long as the festive season
lasts, were equally lighted by the Pagans on the eve of the festival of the
Babylonian god, to do honour to him: for it was one of the distinguishing
peculiarities of his worship to have lighted wax-candles on his altars. *
The Christmas tree, now so common among us, was equally common in Pagan Rome
and Pagan Egypt. In Egypt that tree was the palm-tree; in Rome it was the
fir; * the palm-tree denoting the Pagan Messiah, as Baal-Tamar, the fir
referring to him as Baal-Berith. The mother of Adonis, the Sun-God and great
mediatorial divinity, was mystically said to have been changed into a tree,
and when in that state to have brought forth her divine son. * If the mother
was a tree, the son must have been recognised as the "Man the branch." And
this entirely accounts for the putting of the Yule Log into the fire on
Christmas-eve, and the appearance of the Christmas-tree the next morning.
-- much more -- |